[Ace-users] Re: [tao-users] performance of COS Notification
Douglas C. Schmidt
schmidt at dre.vanderbilt.edu
Mon Jul 16 06:46:15 CDT 2007
> TAO VERSION : 1.5.8
> ACE VERSION : 5.5.8
> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM:
> i686 pc, SUSE linux Enterprise Server 9, Kernel 2.6.5
> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL):
> gcc 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux)
> THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE:
> #include "config-linux.h"
> THE $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude
> /platform_macros.GNU FILE :
> include $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform- linux.GNU
> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features
> (used by MPC when you generate your own makefiles):
> AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED:
> COS Notification
> performance benchmarks for COS Notification
> Hi there,
> we are considering COS (RT) Notification as a means to
> exchange (a large amount of) asynchronous data.
> I guess we are not the first ones out there doing this.
> Are there any recent performance benchmarks or experiences from
> projects, where the Notification service is used?
> We're especially interested in throughput and scalability
> depending on the message size.
More information about the Ace-users