[Ace-users] Re: [tao-users] porting from omniORB to TAO

Friedhelm Wolf friedhelm.wolf at googlemail.com
Tue Jun 12 01:52:07 CDT 2007


Tom,

thanks for the valuable information.
I'll have a close look a the server side code.

Friedhelm

On 6/11/07, Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.Lockhart at jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
> > Are there some documents in the web about it?
> > What about interoperability between omniORB and TAO?
> > Has someone used this combination?
>
> We use omniORBpy in combination with TAO without noticeable issues.
>
> I've done some experiments with small test programs to have code which
> compiles against both TAO and omniORB. At a minimum the code needs some
> #ifdefs to choose the correct IDL header files.
>
> Server-side code typically will need some #ifdef'd blocks since
> server-side internals are not specified in the CORBA standard and there
> are some differences.
>
> If your app is pretty plain-vanilla, then the differences are probably
> minor.
>
> hth
>
>                       - Tom
>
> --
> Thomas Lockhart
> Supervisor, Realtime Software Group
> Interferometry and Large Optical Systems
> Caltech/JPL
>
> _______________________________________________
> tao-users mailing list
> tao-users at mail.cse.wustl.edu
> http://mail.cse.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/tao-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/pipermail/ace-users/attachments/20070612/66a9892c/attachment.htm


More information about the Ace-users mailing list