[Ace-users] Re: [tao-users] porting from omniORB to TAO

[Johnny Willemsen]

Hi,

Thanks for using the PRF form. We haven't ported from omniORB but we did
port from other orbs, mostly what we did was updating includes, no real
complex work and I wouldn't expect much problems with omniORB.

Regards,

Johnny Willemsen
Remedy IT
Postbus 101
2650 AC  Berkel en Rodenrijs
The Netherlands
www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl  

*** Integrated compile and test statistics see http://remedy.nl ***
*** Commercial service and support for ACE/TAO/CIAO             ***
*** See http://www.theaceorb.nl/en/support.html                 ***

> TAO VERSION : 1.5.8
> ACE VERSION : 5.5.8
> 
> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM:
>     i686 pc, SUSE linux Enterprise Server 9, Kernel 2.6.5
> 
> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL):
>     gcc 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux)
> 
> THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE:
>     #include "config-linux.h"
> 
> THE $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU FILE :
>     include $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform-linux.GNU
> 
> SYNOPSIS:
>     experiences about porting omniORB applications to TAO.
> 
> DESCRIPTION:
>     
> Hi there,
> 
> I'm involved in a project using CORBA with the free omniORB
> implementation. Are there experiences in the TAO community,
> which things has to be addressed, when one wants to switch
> to TAO instead. I guess there might be issues with the IDL
> compiler generated C++ code, ...
> 
> Are there some documents in the web about it?
> What about interoperability between omniORB and TAO?
> Has someone used this combination?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Friedhelm
> -- 
> Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
> Der kanns mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tao-users mailing list
> tao-users at mail.cse.wustl.edu
> http://mail.cse.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/tao-users
>