[Ace-users] [ace-users] ACE + TAO Installation (5.4.7 / 1.4.7) Problem

[Johnny Willemsen]

Hi,

The best approach would be the setup using config.h/platform_macros.GNU,
autoconf is really experimental to my opinion.

Regards,

Johnny Willemsen
Remedy IT
Postbus 101
2650 AC  Berkel en Rodenrijs
The Netherlands
www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl  

*** Integrated compile and test statistics see
http://scoreboard.theaceorb.nl ***
*** Commercial service and support for ACE/TAO/CIAO             ***
*** See http://www.theaceorb.nl/en/support.html                 ***

<jim.mathis at lmco.com> wrote in message
news:<1193072998.895972.230370 at i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>...
> Hi,
> 
> Appreciate any info concerning an ACE+TAO installation. Info as
> follows:
> 
> OS: RH Enterprise 4.0
> 64-bit kernel
> 
> There seems to be various ways to install ACE+TAO and I want to make
> certain that I am using the correct procedure. I have read both the
> TAO and ACE html install files but there seems to be some
> contradiction between to two.
> 
> ACE Build (From ACE html)
> 1. mkdir build (ACE_wrappers top-level)
> 2. ../configure
> 3. make
> 4. make install
> 
> ACE+TAO Build (From TAO html)
> 1. Set ACE_ROOT environment variable as outlined in the ACE
> installation notes.
> 2. Build and install ACE under $ACE_ROOT.
> 3. Change directory to $ACE_ROOT/ace and execute make.
> 4. Also build GPERF under $ACE_ROOT/apps/gperf
> 5. Set TAO_ROOT environment variable to $ACE_ROOT/TAO.
> 6. Build and install the TAO release under $TAO_ROOT.
> 
> So what approach is best to take? I've also noticed the following when
> performing the make process:
> 
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/FOSS/ACE_wrappers/apps/gperf/tests'
> ls: /usr/lib/librt.so*: No such file or directory
> make[2]: Entering directory `/opt/FOSS/ACE_wrappers/apps/gperf/tests'
> This project will not be built due to the following missing library:
> ACE
> 
> My OS has the librt.so within /usr/lib/lib64 directory and there is
> also a librt.so.1 under /lib. Should I make a link under /usr/lib or
> is this a configuration issue? Appreciate any additional info. Thanks.
> 
> -Jim
>