[ace-users] loosing signal for "connection closed"
Douglas C. Schmidt
schmidt at dre.vanderbilt.edu
Mon Sep 3 17:25:12 CDT 2007
> still waiting for some suggestions how to avoid this problem?
Unfortunately, our fall semester just began, so I have no spare time to
dig into these sorts of detailed questions. If no one else has time to
help out on the mailing list I recommend you leverage the excellent
commercial support from one of the companies listed at
> otherwise i have to try something else like different strategy for
> forwarding data without lesser usage of message queue in handle_ouput.
> many thankx,
> Douglas C. Schmidt schrieb:
> > Hi Ali,
> > To ensure that we have proper version/platform/compiler information,
> > please make sure you fill out the appropriate problem report form (PRF),
> > which is in
> > $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM
> > $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM
> > or in
> > $ACE_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM
> > $TAO_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM
> > in older versions of ACE+TAO. Make sure to include this information
> > when asking any questions about ACE+TAO since otherwise we have to
> > "guess" what version/platform/compiler/options you've using, which is
> > very error-prone and slows down our responsiveness. If you don't use
> > the PRF, therefore, it is less likely that someone from the core
> > ACE+TAO developer team will be able to answer your question.
> > Naturally, we encourage and appreciate other members of the ACE+TAO
> > user community who can respond to questions that they have the answers
> > to.
> > Thanks,
> > Doug
> >> i am writing a small server wich should forward data from one
> >> client C1 to the second one C2.
> >> C1 is sending data very fast, to slow down C1 with ACE handle_input
> >> of C1's handler returns value > 0 if there is still pending data
> >> for C2.
> >> Data from C1 is put in the message queue of C2, which C2 will
> >> forward in it's handle_ouput after the reactor does a callback. For
> >> that i have increased the size of C2's message queue with
> >> msg_queue()->high_water_mark().
> >> Problem is: All the data is transferred successfully, C1 does send
> >> data slowly if C2 is still processing. But sometimes the reactor
> >> does not call handle_input() if C1 is closing its socket () and
> >> handle_close of C1 is nerver called?
> >> Any hints would be very helpfull?
> >> with best regards,
> >> Ali
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ace-users mailing list
> >> ace-users at mail.cse.wustl.edu
> >> http://mail.cse.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/ace-users
More information about the Ace-users