TAO VERSION : 1.5.8<br>ACE VERSION : 5.5.8<br><br>HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM:<br> i686 pc, SUSE linux Enterprise Server 9, Kernel 2.6.5<br><br>COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL):<br>
gcc 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux)<br><br>THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE:<br> #include "config-linux.h"<br><br>THE $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude<div id="mb_0">/platform_macros.GNU FILE :<br> include $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform-
linux.GNU<br><br>CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features<br> (used by MPC when you generate your own makefiles):<br> N/A<br><br>AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED:<br> COS Notification<br><br>
SYNOPSIS:<br> performance benchmarks for COS Notification<br><br>DESCRIPTION:<br>Hi there,<br><br>we are considering COS (RT) Notification as a means to<br>exchange (a large amount of) asynchronous data.<br>I guess we are not the first ones out there doing this.
<br>Are there any recent performance benchmarks or experiences from<br>projects, where the Notification service is used?<br><br>We're especially interested in throughput and scalability <br>depending on the message size.
<br><br>Thanks in advance,<br><span class="sg">Friedhelm</span></div>