FW: Library

GME GME
Mon Apr 14 15:32:49 CDT 2003



----------
From: 	Aditya Agrawal
Sent: 	Monday, April 14, 2003 9:32:48 AM
To: 	GME Group
Subject: 	RE: Library
Auto forwarded by a Rule

I was able to do this with the version of GME previous to GME 3. 

Adi



-----Original Message-----
From: GME Group 
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 4:44 AM
To: GME List
Subject: FW: Library



>
>----------
>From: 	Peter Volgyesi[SMTP:XVOLGY at ISIS-SERVER.ISIS.VANDERBILT.EDU]
>Sent: 	Monday, April 14, 2003 4:42:50 AM
>To: 	GME Group
>Subject: 	Re: Library
>Auto forwarded by a Rule
>
Hi,

I am very surprised, that this "feature" ever worked some time. Since libraries are attached in binary mode (as .mga files), all the metaref ID-s in the paradigm must be compatible with the library project to be attached. Therefore "subset of the current metamodell" is not good enough for the library. I understand your problem, but since the MGA library does not support this kind of attachment I do not want to mislead our users, and accept a library if the metamodell name is different. (The interesting point here: I did not modified anything recently in the MGA library that is relevant to this problem, so I am really interested in how it was worked before; which vesion of GME was capable to do this )

--
peter


> Hi all,
>
> In previous the previous version of GME in Mobies we had a meta model 
> that used the UML metamodel as a part of it using libraries. We also 
> used libraries in the language that we defined. However the way we 
> used libraries was a bit different. We would attach UML models as 
> libraries to our paradigm and it worked as UML was a subset of our 
> paradigm. Recently I have seen that this is no longer allowed and I 
> get an error message. Currently I have to export the model to XML, 
> change the paradigm name import it back  before I can attach it.
>
> Is it possible allow the libraries to be of different paradigms?
>
> Thanks,
> Adi
>
>
>



More information about the gme-users mailing list