[gme-users] Re: Constraining connections to 0..1

[Zoltan Molnar]

Hi,

The new metainterpreter handles these constraints correctly.
Zoli

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gme-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu 
> [mailto:gme-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf 
> Of Gabriele Trombetti
> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 1:25 PM
> To: A list for GME users to share thoughts and discuss bugs and fixes.
> Subject: [gme-users] Re: Constraining connections to 0..1
> 
> 
> Gabriele Trombetti wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > there is a thing I don't understand in GME. We have a 
> metamodel where
> > there are components and ports. There are some ports that 
> can connect 
> > only to at most one other port. So we have put the 
> cardinality of such 
> > connections to 0..1 both before and after the connector dot in the 
> > metamodel.
> >
> > But in the instance models, we still can create connections from one
> > of such source port to *two* other ports, so that *two* separate 
> > connections get created from the same source, ending in the two 
> > separate destinations. So what is the purpose of the 
> cardinality spec 
> > in the metamodel??
> >
> I forgot to mention that I'm using GME 3.10.13 . I don't know if this 
> "bug" (?) has been solved in later versions...
> 
> > Thanks in advance
> > Gabriele
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gme-users mailing list
> gme-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/gme-users
>