[gme-users] Re: Problem with Meta model
zolmol at isis.vanderbilt.edu
Thu Sep 14 12:52:07 CDT 2006
You forgot to include that specific connection kind into at least
From: gme-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
[mailto:gme-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf Of Adi
Mallikarjuna Reddy V
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [gme-users] Re: Problem with Meta model
I modified the inheritance thing as you said. But the constraints
evaluation showed me the following error. Can you be brief on it.
I am newbie to GME.
On 9/14/06, Matthew J. Emerson <mjemerson at isis.vanderbilt.edu> wrote:
The problem is in the way you modeled the inheritance.
The position of the elements with respect to the inheritance operator on
the modeling palette is not what determines which objects are base types
and which are derived types. Instead, the direction of the connections
linking the types to the inheritance operator is used. One direction
(from an inheritance operator to a class) results in the
DerivedInheritance connection and the other direction (from a class to
an inheritance operator) results in the BaseInheritance connection.
Also, running the constraint manager can typically provide some hints
about possible metamodeling mistakes.
From: gme-users- bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu [mailto:gme-users-
<mailto:bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu>
bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf Of Adi Mallikarjuna Reddy V
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:17 AM
Subject: [gme-users] Re: Problem with Meta model
Sorry for the inconvenience. The correct attachments are attached with
gme-users mailing list
gme-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
<mailto:gme-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gme-users