[gme-users] What did I do this time?

[Joe Porter]

No aspects are specified -- it is using the default aspect.  I'll try
explicitly specifying everything in an aspect and let you know if that
works.

Thanks,
-Joe

On Nov 30, 2007 3:07 PM, Akos Ledeczi <akos.ledeczi at vanderbilt.edu> wrote:

> Joe,
>
> these kinds of problems are typically aspect related. Are aspects
> correctly specified?
>
> Akos
>
>
> Joe Porter wrote:
> > This is probably a subtle misunderstanding on my part, but here goes.
> > When I interpret the attached diagram in MetaGME, the Bounds model
> > does not show up in the top level (ConstraintProblem).   The
> > CompositeConstraint and DisjunctiveConstraint models also do not
> > contain FDVarRef.    It seems to be a problem with my attempt to
> > consolidate the FDVarRef and Member FCOs using the abstract
> > RefContainer class.  Does RefContainer need to have a containing
> > class, or have I strayed into syntax that is entirely forbidden?
> >
> > Can anyone tell me what is going on, and what I should expect to see?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Joe
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gme-users mailing list
> > gme-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> > http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/gme-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> gme-users mailing list
> gme-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/gme-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/pipermail/gme-users/attachments/20071201/b2db02dc/attachment.html