[great-users] pattern cardinality question

[Matthew J. Emerson]

I need to resurrect an old question from April:

 

 

Gabor,
 
Currently GReAT doesn't support the negative pattern withn the
association class with 0 pattern cardinality. We will update it in the
next release.
For you workaround, you can change the pattern with equivalent simple
association with the src rolename and dst rolename on two ends, and set
the PatternCardinality as 0. This replacement works for finding the
association, but not for adding the association.
 
Thanks,
Feng
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Gabor Madl 
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 6:14 PM
To: great-users
Subject: [great-users] Patterncardinality on connections
 
Hi,
 
I found another problem in GReAT. I want to find patterns in which two
models are not connected by a given connection. However, GReAT does not
check when I set the patterncardinalty to 0 corresponding to the
association class. Also, if the configuration fails and I click on
cancel instead of closing the cmd window GME crashes. This is really
annoying.
 
Gabe
 
 
Was this issue ever resolved?  I'm currently attempting to perform
negative pattern matching using an association class with 0 pattern
cardinality, and it doesn't seem to work.  I was, however, able to get
the work-around Feng mentioned to work.
 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/pipermail/great-users/attachments/20041215/ae155ea1/attachment.htm