[great-users] RE: GREAT idea

[Aditya Agrawal]

I will fix this before the next release.

 

Thanks,

Adi

 

PS: Please use the list for bug reports so that every one knows about
them. 

 

------------------------------------------

Aditya Agrawal 

mailto:aditya.agrawal at vanderbilt.edu

http://aditya.isis.vanderbilt.edu/

Institute For Software Integrated Systems (ISIS) www.isis.vanderbilt.edu


Vanderbilt University 

2015 Terrace Place 

Nashville, TN 37203

615 322 3164

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Attila Vizhanyo 
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 5:32 PM
To: Aditya Agrawal
Subject: GREAT idea

 

Adi,

 

I've instantly bumped into some inconvenient use scenario, which can be
fixed relatively easily.

Suppose, you have already one meta model in your UMT model, and invoked
the

Great master interpreter. This tool is good enough to create a
configuration folder

for you, and fills out the meta information in that configuration model
automatically.

Note that because there is only one meta model, the resulted UDM meta
file is .xml.

Now, if you append your UMT model with one more meta model, the master
interpreter

will fail, because of the multiple meta models, .udm project file should
be generated.

This is quite confusing. 

 

So my proposal would be to have this interpreter _update_ the meta
information in the

configuration model to .udm/ .xml automatically, depending on the number
of meta models

present in the UMT model.

 

Let me know, what you think,

Attila

 

PS: I will spare my further ideas until I finished my first translator
using Great. ;)

Then we can go through that list at one time, and see what should be
done. 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/pipermail/great-users/attachments/20040128/57929740/attachment.htm