[great-users] UML class diagrams with GME

[e116501 at ceng.metu.edu.tr]

Association, inheritance etc are all OK. But what about function definitions of a class? Classes in that GME's UML model has only attributes, we can not specify the functions of a class. Am I wrong?

On 09 May 2005 17:00 EEST you wrote:

> Hi Ozer. GME ships with a UML class diagrams modeling environment. It
> should pre-registered when you install GME. It captures classes, simple
> associations, association classes, constraints, inheritance, and
> composition.
> 
> --Matt
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: great-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> [mailto:great-users-
> > bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf Of
> e116501 at ceng.metu.edu.tr
> > Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 10:01 AM
> > To: great-users
> > Subject: [great-users] UML class diagrams with GME
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > is there a way to prepare metamodels similar to UML class diagrams.
> > Actually what I only need is a modeling element just like a UML class
> > (that is fields for classname, attributes and functions of the class).
> As
> > far as I see, there is no such modeling element in GME Metamodel.
> Models,
> > atoms and other constructs have only 2 fields (for name and
> attributes).
> > 
> > Or, even if there is no such metamodel in GME, can I produce these UML
> > classes with GReAT transformations?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance.
> > 
> > Ozer
> > _______________________________________________
> > great-users mailing list
> > great-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> > http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/great-users
>