[great-users] be careful with crosslink rolenames

[Krishnakumar B]

Hi Attila,

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 15:18:39 -0500, Attila Vizhanyo wrote:
> Thanks Matt for calling our attention to this hidden implementation feature.
>
> Here is a list of reserved names in Udm. You cannot use these names as 
> association role names when specifying a UML class diagram.
> - Instances
> - Derived
> - ArcheType
> - instances
> - derived
> - archetype
> - hasRealArchetype
> - isInstance
> - isSubtype
> - __impl
> - type
> - uniqueId
> - container
> - GetAdjacentObjects
> - GetAdjacentUniqueObjects
> - GetParent
> - GetChildObjects
> - GetPeersFromAssociationClassObject
> - DeleteObject

Wouldn't namespaces solve the issues with name clashes?

-kitty.

-- 
Krishnakumar B <kitty at dre dot vanderbilt dot edu>
Institute for Software Integrated Systems, Dept. of EECS, Vanderbilt University