<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Dear Ozer,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">You are correct in your assessment.
In order to have function definitions as well you will need to extend the
UML metamodel that ships with GME. </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">You can do this by opening the UML metamodel,
found in the C:\Program Files\GME\Paradigms\UML\UMLMeta.mga, and modifying
it or by attaching the UML meta as a library in a new metamodel and extending
it.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Adi<br>
</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">-----------------------------------<br>
Aditya Agrawal<br>
Researcher<br>
IBM T. J. Watson<br>
mailto:aagrawa@us.ibm.com<br>
+1 (914) 784-6068 (TL 863)<br>
</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>great-users-bounces@list.isis.vanderbilt.edu wrote
on 05/10/2005 09:13:08 AM:<br>
<br>
> Association, inheritance etc are all OK. But what about function <br>
> definitions of a class? Classes in that GME's UML model has only <br>
> attributes, we can not specify the functions of a class. Am I wrong?<br>
> <br>
> On 09 May 2005 17:00 EEST you wrote:<br>
> <br>
> > Hi Ozer. GME ships with a UML class diagrams modeling environment.
It<br>
> > should pre-registered when you install GME. It captures classes,
simple<br>
> > associations, association classes, constraints, inheritance,
and<br>
> > composition.<br>
> > <br>
> > --Matt<br>
> > <br>
> > > -----Original Message-----<br>
> > > From: great-users-bounces@list.isis.vanderbilt.edu<br>
> > [mailto:great-users-<br>
> > > bounces@list.isis.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf Of<br>
> > e116501@ceng.metu.edu.tr<br>
> > > Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 10:01 AM<br>
> > > To: great-users<br>
> > > Subject: [great-users] UML class diagrams with GME<br>
> > > <br>
> > > Hi,<br>
> > > <br>
> > > is there a way to prepare metamodels similar to UML class
diagrams.<br>
> > > Actually what I only need is a modeling element just like
a UML class<br>
> > > (that is fields for classname, attributes and functions
of the class).<br>
> > As<br>
> > > far as I see, there is no such modeling element in GME Metamodel.<br>
> > Models,<br>
> > > atoms and other constructs have only 2 fields (for name
and<br>
> > attributes).<br>
> > > <br>
> > > Or, even if there is no such metamodel in GME, can I produce
these UML<br>
> > > classes with GReAT transformations?<br>
> > > <br>
> > > Thanks in advance.<br>
> > > <br>
> > > Ozer<br>
> > > _______________________________________________<br>
> > > great-users mailing list<br>
> > > great-users@list.isis.vanderbilt.edu<br>
> > > http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/great-users<br>
> > <br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> great-users mailing list<br>
> great-users@list.isis.vanderbilt.edu<br>
> http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/great-users<br>
</tt></font>