<br>Hi everyone! I'm a new user of the GME/GREAT tool suite and I have some questions for you guys.<br>1. I have written a rule containing a pattern including an abstract class (at level n). I want GREAT to use this rule to create an object based on the pattern provided as input. However, in my next rule, I need to get access to the inherited classes (level n-1) in the next rule ie the real objects abstracted. Since GREAT does not allow me to represent inheritance (as specified in the Metamodel) can I just (in the next rule) connect the real objects at n-1 to the real one at n+1 as children and parent by bypassing the abstract class? If no please clarify this point to me. I will also welcome any more efficient way to handle this kind of situation.<br>
2. Is there anyway to "debug" or test the transformation rule by rule prior to running the Master interpreter?<br>Thank,<br>Leonard<br><br><br>