[tao-users] AMH status

Phil Mesnier mesnier_p at ociweb.com
Mon Jun 15 14:58:22 CDT 2015

Hi Mello,

I imagine this is still true. I'm not sure why it is true though. It might be a simple reason, like missing infrastructure code, or a more difficult one such as an implicit assumption that a reply will be sent by the thread that received the request. 

Why don't you make a test and see what happens?

> On Jun 15, 2015, at 7:53 AM, Cesar Mello <cmello at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
> From the docs/releasenotes/amh.html:
> "Currently, AMH doesn't work in conjunction with Interceptors and behaviour is undefined if both are used together."
> Is this still true?
> Thank you a lot for the attention!
> Best regards
> Mello
> _______________________________________________
> tao-users mailing list
> tao-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tao-users

Phil Mesnier
Principal Software Engineer and Partner,   http://www.ociweb.com
Object Computing, Inc.                     +01.314.579.0066 x225

More information about the tao-users mailing list