[udm-dev] IMPORTANT: GReAT vs udm_ns results
Attila Vizhanyo
viza at isis.vanderbilt.edu
Wed Aug 3 11:48:25 CDT 2005
Endre,
Jo hir, hogy mennek a GReAT tesztek.
Irtal Matt-nek reference port ugyben?
Kossz,
Attila
> -----Original Message-----
> From: udm-dev-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> [mailto:udm-dev-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf
> Of Endre Magyari
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 14:39
> To: udm-dev at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> Subject: Re: [udm-dev] IMPORTANT: GReAT vs udm_ns results
>
>
> Attila,
>
> > 2, At least one, (possible more) Udm TOMI function code has been
> > invalidated because of the removal of Diagram-Class composition
> > relationship in UmlInUml.
> > Example: in the implementation of set<Object>
> > Object::GetAdjacentObjects(const ::Uml::Class & clsDstType, const
> > AssociationInfo& ascType)
> > Ln 300:
> ::Uml::Diagram::Cast(clsDstType.parent()), where clsDstType
> > is of type Uml::Class
> >
> > I would recommend to search for "Uml::Diagram" in all Udm
> source code
> > base to find all problems like 2. This is quite tedious, but still
> > necessary to guarantee elimination of the problem. (I have
> done this
> > for GReAT already)
>
> It seems that only in UdmTomi.cpp were 4 such cases.
> I have corrected them and checked in the modifications.
>
> thanks,
>
> Endre
> _______________________________________________
> udm-dev mailing list
> udm-dev at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/udm-dev
>
More information about the udm-dev
mailing list