[udm-dev] Re: question for next week

[Endre Magyari]

Zsolt,

	I will make it compile today, but this does not mean that it will  
actually work.
	Someone should take care of the OTIF integration of the new UDM features  
(like Namespace), and eventually tell me what to generate differently.


Thanks,
Endre

On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 23:38:48 -0500, Zsolt Kalmar  
<zsolt.kalmar at vanderbilt.edu> wrote:

> Endre,
> I've tried to compile OTIF with udm_ns.
> Udm_ns has the following problems:
> 1. -c switch was commented out, I put it back
> 2. UdmCotbacpp.cpp file was not in the project, I put it back.
> 3. It does not compile, I gave up.
>
> Thanks,
> zsolt
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Endre Magyari [mailto:endre at isis.vanderbilt.edu]
>> Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 2:02 PM
>> To: Gabor Karsai; Attila Vizhanyo; Feng Shi; Kalmar, Zsolt; 'Neema,
>> Sandeep'; Daniel Balasubramanian; Anantha Narayanan
>> Subject: Re: question for next week
>>
>>
>> There were a couple of minor issues, but as of now all tests are green  
>> for
>> both udm_ns and udm_ns2 projects.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Endre
>>
>> On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 01:01:40 -0500, Gabor Karsai
>> <gabor.karsai at vanderbilt.edu> wrote:
>>
>> > Guys,
>> >
>> > Now that the new and shiny GME is out, can we build a compatible GReAT
>> > release? Is UDM_NS ready for this?
>> > Please think about this and let's discuss it Monday.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > -- Gabor
>> >
>
>