[udm-dev] Re: question for next week

[Endre Magyari]

Zsolt,

	Now it compiles, but there is some work on the OTIF side as well, as  
follows:


for udm_ns:

   -- new functions to implement on OTIF side:

Namespace CreateCORBANamespace();
void InitCORBANamespace(const Namespace &obj, const Diagram &parent, const  
char *name);

   -- existing signatures to modify:

-void InitCORBAClass(const Class &obj, const Diagram &parent, const char  
*name,
bool isAbstract, const char *stereo = NULL);
+void InitCORBAClass(const Class &obj, const Namespace &parent, const char  
*name, bool isAbstract, const char *stereo = NULL);

-void InitCORBAAssociation(const Association &obj, const Diagram &parent,  
const
char *name);
+void InitCORBAAssociation(const Association &obj, const Namespace  
&parent, const char *name);

-void InitCORBAComposition(const Composition &obj, const Diagram &parent,  
const
char *name);
+void InitCORBAComposition(const Composition &obj, const Namespace  
&parent, const char *name);


- for udm_ns2:

	-- New functions to implement on OTIF side:

Namespace CreateCORBANamespace();
void InitCORBANamespace(const Namespace &obj, const Diagram &parent, const  
char *name);
void InitCORBAClass(const Class &obj, const Namespace &parent, const char  
*name, bool isAbstract, const char *stereo = NULL);
void InitCORBAAssociation(const Association &obj, const Namespace &parent,  
const char *name);
void InitCORBAComposition(const Composition &obj, const Namespace &parent,  
const char *name);



	I have tried to modify the logic of generation the CORBA init code  
according to the modifications in Udm, but this must be tested once the  
OTIF side is ready.

	
  Thanks,
Endre


On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 23:38:48 -0500, Zsolt Kalmar  
<zsolt.kalmar at vanderbilt.edu> wrote:

> Endre,
> I've tried to compile OTIF with udm_ns.
> Udm_ns has the following problems:
> 1. -c switch was commented out, I put it back
> 2. UdmCotbacpp.cpp file was not in the project, I put it back.
> 3. It does not compile, I gave up.
>
> Thanks,
> zsolt
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Endre Magyari [mailto:endre at isis.vanderbilt.edu]
>> Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 2:02 PM
>> To: Gabor Karsai; Attila Vizhanyo; Feng Shi; Kalmar, Zsolt; 'Neema,
>> Sandeep'; Daniel Balasubramanian; Anantha Narayanan
>> Subject: Re: question for next week
>>
>>
>> There were a couple of minor issues, but as of now all tests are green  
>> for
>> both udm_ns and udm_ns2 projects.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Endre
>>
>> On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 01:01:40 -0500, Gabor Karsai
>> <gabor.karsai at vanderbilt.edu> wrote:
>>
>> > Guys,
>> >
>> > Now that the new and shiny GME is out, can we build a compatible GReAT
>> > release? Is UDM_NS ready for this?
>> > Please think about this and let's discuss it Monday.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > -- Gabor
>> >
>
>