Harmon might be able to get away with that for testing. My code doesn't fare so well in that case, since it depends heavily on the refport parent relationships (which otherwise seem to be working well). It's not a showstopper for me, just an annoyance. I can't inspect the xml data, which is very useful when debugging the interpreters. The alternative is insertion of print statements, just like the good old days :-) <br>
<br>I think Harmon was more seriously blocked by this issue.<br><br>-Joe<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Gabor Karsai <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gabor@isis.vanderbilt.edu">gabor@isis.vanderbilt.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US">
<div>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">So if the extra relations are added to the UML-style meta,
udmcopy is broken? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">I wonder if you could use the ‘original’ xml (diagram) and xsd?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Wingdings; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);"><span>n<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"> </span></span></span><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Gabor</span></p>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>