[ace-users] Doubt on __ACE_INLINE__!
Douglas C. Schmidt
schmidt at dre.vanderbilt.edu
Sun Aug 5 10:20:24 CDT 2007
To ensure that we have proper version/platform/compiler information,
please make sure you fill out the appropriate problem report form
(PRF), which is in
in older versions of ACE+TAO. Make sure to include this information
when asking any questions about ACE+TAO since otherwise we have to
"guess" what version/platform/compiler/options you've using, which is
very error-prone and slows down our responsiveness. If you don't use
the PRF, therefore, it is less likely that someone from the core
ACE+TAO developer team will be able to answer your question.
Naturally, we encourage and appreciate other members of the ACE+TAO
user community who can respond to questions that they have the answers
> In some of the platform config files (like solaris) the
> __ACE_INLINE__ macro is defined whereas in windows config files the
> same is not defined. I went through the ACE source and understood
> that the inline functions can either be included in the header files
> (if __ACE_INLINE__ is defined) or in the source files (if
> __ACE_INLINE__ is not defined).
Yes, that's correct.
> What is the purpose of doing so? Is there any benefit in this?
It enables users to selectively toggle the amount of inlining they
> Also, if we want to use only the header files for building an
> application in Solaris 8, it throws an error stating that the
> particular ".inl or .i" file was not found. How to resolve this?
It's not clear what the problem is - can you please (1) upgrade to ACE
5.5.10 and (2) send us a short example that demonstrates the problem?
Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt Professor and Associate Chair
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science TEL: (615) 343-8197
Vanderbilt University WEB: www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt
Nashville, TN 37203 NET: d.schmidt at vanderbilt.edu
More information about the Ace-users