[Ace-users] Re: [tao-users] porting from omniORB to TAO
jwillemsen at remedy.nl
Tue Jun 19 08:06:11 CDT 2007
Thanks for using the PRF form. We haven't ported from omniORB but we did
port from other orbs, mostly what we did was updating includes, no real
complex work and I wouldn't expect much problems with omniORB.
2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs
www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl
*** Integrated compile and test statistics see http://remedy.nl ***
*** Commercial service and support for ACE/TAO/CIAO ***
*** See http://www.theaceorb.nl/en/support.html ***
> TAO VERSION : 1.5.8
> ACE VERSION : 5.5.8
> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM:
> i686 pc, SUSE linux Enterprise Server 9, Kernel 2.6.5
> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL):
> gcc 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux)
> THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE:
> #include "config-linux.h"
> THE $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU FILE :
> include $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform-linux.GNU
> experiences about porting omniORB applications to TAO.
> Hi there,
> I'm involved in a project using CORBA with the free omniORB
> implementation. Are there experiences in the TAO community,
> which things has to be addressed, when one wants to switch
> to TAO instead. I guess there might be issues with the IDL
> compiler generated C++ code, ...
> Are there some documents in the web about it?
> What about interoperability between omniORB and TAO?
> Has someone used this combination?
> Thanks in advance,
> Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
> Der kanns mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
> tao-users mailing list
> tao-users at mail.cse.wustl.edu
More information about the Ace-users