[Ace-users] Re: [tao-users] suppress message from tao_idl

Jeff Parsons j.parsons at vanderbilt.edu
Tue Jun 19 11:46:30 CDT 2007

Because the feature to output the IDL filename has been
around for months and we got one request to suppress it.
Making suppression now the default seems like an overreaction.
But I have no strong feelings one way or the other.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Cleeland [mailto:cleeland at ociweb.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 11:23 AM
> To: Jeff Parsons
> Cc: Johnny Willemsen; Vikram Karandikar; tao-users at cse.wustl.edu
> Subject: Re: [tao-users] suppress message from tao_idl
> On Jun 19, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Jeff Parsons wrote:
> > So I think what will be added is something like a -Q
> > flag to suppress the 'processing xxx.idl' output.
> Why not make the default silent, and add an option for verbosity?
> ---
> Chris Cleeland, Principal Software Engineer
> http://www.theaceorb.com AND http://www.ociweb.com

More information about the Ace-users mailing list