[Ace-users] Using ACE_Svc_Handler::msg_queue() for buffering is slow

[azathoth]

You're right, and now that I'm setting it correctly performance is
reasonable.

Thanks for your help!

On Nov 5, 1:44 pm, schm... at dre.vanderbilt.edu (Douglas C. Schmidt)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >My mistake, in this case it was actually calling send more than I
> >thought it was (using strace to verify). Nagle's algorithm does seem
> >the likely candidate.
>
> >I'm left wondering if I've failed to set TCP_NODELAY correctly:
>
> >int Param = 1;
> >this->peer().set_option(0, TCP_NODELAY, &Param, sizeof(Param));
>
> >inside the constructor for the ACE_Svc_Handler?
>
> You seem to be setting this incorrectly.  Please see Chapter 3 of
> C++NPv1 <www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE/book1/> for instructions on how
> to do this or grep for TCP_NODELAY in the ACE tests and follow the
> example there.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Doug
>
> --
> Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt                       Professor and Associate Chair
> Electrical Engineering and Computer Science  TEL: (615) 343-8197
> Vanderbilt University                        WEB:www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt
> Nashville, TN 37203                          NET: d.schm... at vanderbilt.edu