[ace-users] Problem with ACE_Priority_reactor

[Douglas C. Schmidt]

Hi Alex,

To ensure that we have proper version/platform/compiler information,
please make sure you fill out the appropriate problem report form
(PRF), which is in

$ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM
$TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM

or in

$ACE_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM
$TAO_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM

in older versions of ACE+TAO.  Make sure to include this information
when asking any questions about ACE+TAO since otherwise we have to
"guess" what version/platform/compiler/options you've using, which is
very error-prone and slows down our responsiveness.  If you don't use
the PRF, therefore, it is less likely that someone from the core
ACE+TAO developer team will be able to answer your question.
Naturally, we encourage and appreciate other members of the ACE+TAO
user community who can respond to questions that they have the answers
to.

BTW, please see the ACE_ROOT/tests/Priority_Reactor_Test.cpp for some
examples of how to use the ACE_Priority_Reactor properly.

Thanks,

        Doug


>I was using the default reactor implementaion and I switched to work
>with ACE_Priority_Reactor implementation. I have 40 sockets
>(ACE_Event_Handlers) managed by it.
>
>When I decide to close them my application crashes and in the debugger
>I see that in dispatch_io_set, the handlers I have just removed (using
>remove_handler) are bring still manipulated by the reactor.
>
>Is it a known bug? Did I do something wrong?
>


-- 
Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt                       Professor and Associate Chair
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science  TEL: (615) 343-8197
Vanderbilt University                        WEB: www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt
Nashville, TN 37203                          NET: d.schmidt at vanderbilt.edu