[Ace-users] [ace-users] Subject: Proactor: Linux proactor always returnserrno 14 (Bad Address) with UDP socket
shuston at riverace.com
Fri Feb 22 07:00:21 CST 2008
A number of POSIX systems on the scoreboard are running the
Proactor_Test stuff every day - Linux is the main factor in the async
I/O bashing. If there are problems in the code, please also try to
illustrate them in the Proactor_Test or another test so we can be sure
they get fixed and stay fixed.
Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation
Want to take ACE training on YOUR schedule?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ace-users-bounces at cse.wustl.edu
> [mailto:ace-users-bounces at cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas
> C. Schmidt
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:59 PM
> To: fernando.fcavalcanti at gmail.com; ace-users at cse.wustl.edu
> Subject: Re: [ace-users] Subject: Proactor: Linux proactor
> always returnserrno 14 (Bad Address) with UDP socket
> Hi Fernando,
> >ACE_POSIX_Asynch_Read_Dgram_Result::complete (...) and
> >ACE_POSIX_Asynch_Write_Dgram_Result::complete (...) also needed to
> >updated so as to move the pointers in the message block when we
> >send bytes asynchronously.
> >I will continue posting here all changes I make locally... I have
> >clue how to update the actual ACE distribution code or what is the
> >process on submitting bug fixes.
> Pleaes see
> for information on how to submit fixes. The ACE_POSIX_Asynch stuff
> old and not widely tested - largely because async I/O on POSIX
> OS platforms hasn't been very stable historically. If you can help
> improve this stuff it would be great. If you have any question
> the process after reading that webpage please let us know.
> Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt Professor and
> Associate Chair
> Electrical Engineering and Computer Science TEL: (615) 343-8197
> Vanderbilt University WEB:
> Nashville, TN 37203 NET:
> d.schmidt at vanderbilt.edu
> ace-users mailing list
> ace-users at mail.cse.wustl.edu
More information about the Ace-users