[cosmic-users] Usage questions on IDL generator
Krishnakumar B
kitty at dre.vanderbilt.edu
Wed Sep 14 14:11:09 CDT 2005
Hi Bala,
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:30:16 -0500, Balachandran Natarajan wrote:
> Kitty-
>
> On Tuesday, 13 September, 2005 at 16:51:32 -0500, Krishnakumar B wrote:
> [...]
> > I think we should suck the contents of module CORBA and represent them as
> > read-only elements. Then you will be able to drag a reference to
> > CORBA::Policy in the model. This would get rid of problems in both
> > importing as well exporting IDL.
>
> I am not sure whether so much pain is required. In the Object attribute
> pane (where we specify whether the interface is local or not), another
> piece of user provided info could be whether the interface is a policy
> or not. Based on the value of this attribute, the generated IDL can
> inherit from CORBA::Policy, and also include Policy.pidl from
> $TAO_ROOT/tao. Makes sense?
How will the case where some user wants to derive from some other type in
module CORBA be handled? Is CORBA::Policy the only spec-defined type that
the user will want to reference (either by inheritance, or by inclusion) in
his model?
-kitty.
--
Krishnakumar B <kitty at dre dot vanderbilt dot edu>
Institute for Software Integrated Systems, Dept. of EECS, Vanderbilt University
More information about the cosmic-users
mailing list