FW: FW: GME Meta bug(tracking)

[GME]

----------
From: 	Gabor Karsai
Sent: 	Monday, November 18, 2002 11:37:35 AM
To: 	GME Group
Subject: 	RE: FW: GME Meta bug(tracking)
Auto forwarded by a Rule

For ANTS we bought a Linux box and Gergely put CVS and Bugzilla on it.
It can (but crrently doesn't) run a collaboration site (e.g. Plone).
We can ask Gergely how to set one up and task one of the people
working on GME to do it (the SSafe files should be migrated to CVS, though).
-- Gabor

> -----Original Message-----
> From: GME Group 
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 10:38 AM
> To: GME List
> Subject: FW: FW: GME Meta bug(tracking)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > ----------
> > From: 	Peter 
> Volgyesi[SMTP:XVOLGY at ISIS-SERVER.ISIS.VANDERBILT.EDU]
> > Sent: 	Monday, November 18, 2002 10:26:10 AM
> > To: 	GME Group
> > Subject: 	Re: FW: GME Meta bug(tracking)
> > Auto forwarded by a Rule
> > 
> I have used/installed Bugzilla before. The problem is that we have 
> Windows servers where Bugzilla not excels. (OK it works, but one can 
> image how easily runs an Apache/Perl/MySQL based web application on 
> Windows.) The other thing we should consider is how to integrate this 
> bugtraq system with other tools. (Mailing lists, revision control 
> system, public and internal release building.)
> 
> Building such a system (that is usable and maintainable) is 
> not an easy 
> task and far more than installing a software or two. In our 
> situation I 
> would consider to use sourceforge. However this requires GME to be 
> opensource. Well, maybe we should only wait a bit.
> 
> --
> peter
> 
> GME Group wrote:
> > 
> >>----------
> >>From: 	Tamas Paka
> >>Sent: 	Monday, November 18, 2002 10:22:21 AM
> >>To: 	GME Group
> >>Subject: 	RE: GME Meta bug(tracking)
> >>Auto forwarded by a Rule
> >>
> > 
> > I can speak with Gergely about that, as far as I know, he 
> installed and
> > configured bugzilla for another project.
> > Shall I ask him how it goes?
> > 
> > Tamas
> > 
> > 
> >>No (I don't know about any ;) ).
> >>Many meta related problems are not specific to the 
> >>metainterpreter, so I 
> >>can live with only one list... What we would need is a bugtracking 
> >>system, where you guys could check the state of your 
> reports. It is my
> >>fault that such a service does not exist today.
> >>
> >>--
> >>peter
> >>
> > 
> 
>