[gme-users] MetaGME confusion

[Zoltan Molnar]

Hi,

1st Hint: you have to connect the aspect to the owner (models tipically)

2nd Hint: please use different names for the classes (Business)

Br, Zoltan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gme-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu 
> [mailto:gme-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf 
> Of Stefan Marte
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 7:43 AM
> To: gme-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> Subject: [gme-users] MetaGME confusion
> 
> 
> Hi everybody!
> 
> Since I am new to GME and this list, please fogive me
> any stupid questions I may ask. Currently I have a
> fairly simple problem with MetaGME and I hope someone
> can help me.
> 
> I am trying to define a simple model containing a
> single diagram/model, a folder, a basemodel and a
> derived model and a reference to the basemodel which
> should be contained in the diagram.
> 
> The idea is, to have a master diagram which shows
> connections between several organisations, and those 
> organisations at the root level.
> 
> Now 2 things are happening. First of all, even though
> I have defined an aspect called "Business" with all
> objects except the foolder assigned to it, the
> interpreter complains about the objects having no
> aspect defined and creates a dummy aspect called
> "Aspect".
> 
> The second thing is, one I add the mentioned derived
> model to the metamodel, I end up getting an error
> during interpretation.
> 
> all this happens with GME 4.5.18
> 
> I have attached the model and the logfile.
> 
> I hope someone can explain me where I go wrong.
> 
> thanks in advance
> 
> Stefan Marte
> 
> 
> 	
> 
> 	
> 		
> ___________________________________________________________
> Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 100MB Speicher kostenlos 
> - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de
>