[gme-users] Linking problems with STLPort
Peter Volgyesi
peter.volgyesi at vanderbilt.edu
Fri Jul 16 18:51:00 CDT 2004
If you are using stlport with GME, the following line should be uncommented
in the stl_user_config.h file :
# define _STLP_NO_OWN_IOSTREAMS 1
By default it is commented out.
It might cause similar linker problems.
--
peter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gme-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> [mailto:gme-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf
> Of Jacques Kerner
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 6:00 PM
> To: A list for GME users to share thoughts and discuss bugs and fixes.
> Subject: Re: [gme-users] Linking problems with STLPort
>
> Thanks,
>
> Somehow we were able to correct this problem by using the
> stlport installation of the first machine, and using it to
> replace the one on the second machine (where it did not
> compile). And the error disappears.
> So it must be a different way of compiling the stlport on
> both machines that have lead to the linking problem (as I
> understand it). I could not locate the cause more precisely.
> As you mention, there must be something different in the
> setting that where used at one time or another.
>
> Sorry for the disturbance, and thank you for your efforts. In
> case the problem reappears, there will be at least some precedent.
>
> Jacques Kerner.
>
> Akos Ledeczi a écrit :
>
> > Are you sure that the global include directory settings in Visual
> > Studio are the same on both machines? Because if they are not, the
> > order it looks for stl stuff in the directories could differ and it
> > could find another stl on the machine you get the link errors. Akos
> >
> >
> > Jacques Kerner wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am having problems linking interpreters for GME. Sometimes it
> >> works, but sometimes, I get the following kind of errors :
> >>
> >> INIWriter.obj : error LNK2001: external symbol
> "__declspec(dllimport)
> >> public: static bool __cdecl _STL::
> >> __char_traits_base<char,int>::eq_int_type(int const &,int const &)"
> >> (__imp_?eq_int_type@?$__char_traits_base at DH@_STL@@SA_NABH0 at Z)
> >> unresolved
> >>
> >>
> >> (and a lot of them). This code compiles and links
> perfectly well on a
> >> machine, but installed on another machine, it doesn't
> link, in spite
> >> of the fact that the installation of STLPort was conducted in the
> >> same fashion, and the include libraries are put in the
> exact same order.
> >>
> >> I think it is actually a problem of namespace naming and confusion
> >> between "_STL" and "std". Despite my efforts, I was unable
> to find a
> >> solution to this problem. How can I prevent this from
> happening ? Any
> >> hints on this problem are deeply welcome. Thanks in advance!
> >>
> >> Jacques Kerner.
> >>
> >> Jeff Parsons a écrit :
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Peter Volgyesi
> [mailto:peter.volgyesi at vanderbilt.edu] Sent:
> >>>> Thursday, July 08, 2004 5:18 AM
> >>>> To: gme-users
> >>>> Subject: RE: [gme-users] connections to ports w/ decorator
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Hotspots are not controlled by the decorator. The
> decorator is able
> >>>> (should) specify only the ports and their locations. The two
> >>>> relevant methods (COM
> >>>> level):
> >>>>
> >>>> HRESULT GetPortLocation([in] IMgaFCO *fco, [out] long *sx, [out]
> >>>> long *sy, [out] long *ex, [out] long *ey); HRESULT
> GetPorts([out,
> >>>> retval] IMgaFCOs **portFCOs); The methods are implemented in the
> >>>> BoxDecorator as
> >>>>
> >>>> STDMETHODIMP CBoxDecorator::GetPortLocation( IMgaFCO *pFCO, long
> >>>> *sx, long *sy, long *ex, long *ey ); STDMETHODIMP
> >>>> CBoxDecorator::GetPorts( IMgaFCOs **portFCOs );
> >>>>
> >>>> First, GME calls GetPorts, where you can specify a collection of
> >>>> child objects (visible as ports). Next, GME calls the
> >>>> GetPortLocation() method repeatedly for each port object in that
> >>>> collection.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ports are automatically handled as hotspots (connectable
> points) by
> >>>> the GUI along with the primeter of the bounding object.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hope, this helps.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yes, it does. I guess I figured that, since my decorator
> is calling
> >>> elsewhere to gets its own port information anyway, and
> not creating
> >>> or destroying ports, that it holds nothing that GME can't get
> >>> somewhere else. But even if that were true, GME would
> still need the
> >>> port location info, since a decorator could draw the port
> somewhere
> >>> other than where the default decorator would draw it (which my
> >>> decorator does). So, duh, once I implemented those
> >>> 2 callback methods in my decorator, it worked fine.
> Thanks for the
> >>> explanation.
> >>>
> >>> Jeff
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> peter
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: gme-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> >>>>> [mailto:gme-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu] On
> Behalf Of
> >>>>> Jeff Parsons
> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 7:09 PM
> >>>>> To: gme-users
> >>>>> Subject: [gme-users] connections to ports w/ decorator
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have written a decorator that takes over the drawing
> of just a
> >>>>> few things in a model, the relevant one being one
> certain kind of
> >>>>> model and its ports. What the decorator does is choose between
> >>>>> mirror image icons depending on which side of the model
> the port
> >>>>> is drawn on. These ports can have connections to other ports in
> >>>>> the same kind of model. It seems that, using the decorator,
> >>>>> connections don't appear in the model, whereas without
> it they do.
> >>>>> I've borrowed some code from GME source code for this stuff,
> >>>>> leaving out some things since my use case is not as general as
> >>>>> GME's default decorator. I've looked for something I left out
> >>>>> relating to hotspots but all that stuff seems to be outside the
> >>>>> decorator part of GEM and I don't see how I could change my
> >>>>> decorator code to make this work. Can anyone help me
> out with info
> >>>>> about what code in ModelDecorator or PortDecorator controls
> >>>>> hotspots, if any?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jeff
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> gme-users mailing list
> >>>>> gme-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> >>>>> http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/gme-users
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> gme-users mailing list
> >>>> gme-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> >>>> http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/gme-users
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> gme-users mailing list
> >>> gme-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> >>> http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/gme-users
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gme-users mailing list
> >> gme-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> >> http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/gme-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gme-users mailing list
> > gme-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> > http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/gme-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> gme-users mailing list
> gme-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/gme-users
More information about the gme-users
mailing list