[gme-users] Aspects

[Zoltan Molnar]

Hi,

There should be no limit. Where do you experience exactly that limit? In
the drop down list or somewhere else?

Regarding your former observations.

The viewable attribute will be reintroduced in the next release.

>* when using equivalences, it is unclear, which object
>is the "master", 
>esp. when multiple equivalences are involved.

Formerly the master object was the one connected with the "...Right" arm
like "EquivRight". To achieve correct behaviour you had to have each
time the right object (or proxy to it) on the "...Right" side.
Now this has been simplified:
The object name is selectable with the latest release, and the
attributes of the equivalent objects are merged.


>BUGS
>====
>
>* Aspect Synchronization
>Show "Display Name" for aspects instead of aspect name

True, it was shown previously, and with the latest release is shown only
if the aspect is lonely (no equivalences involved)

Br, Zoli


> -----Original Message-----
> From: gme-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu 
> [mailto:gme-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf 
> Of Stefan Marte
> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 5:34 AM
> To: gme-users
> Subject: [gme-users] Aspects
> 
> 
> Hi everybody!
> 
> Is there any limit to the number of Aspects in a metamodel? 
> There seems to be sort of a limit in the aspect mapping 
> screen (25 if i see this correctly), but are there any other limits? 
> 
> tourlou
> 
> Stefan
>