[gme-users] Re: Small question and discussion forums
Zoltan Molnar
zolmol at isis.vanderbilt.edu
Thu Feb 23 10:17:44 CST 2006
Hi,
If you specify 0..1 on the containment line the paradigm will have a constraint defined automatically.
However if you'd like to make that constraint preventive, you
-either specify events for all automatic constraints in the Options dialog shown during MetaInterpretation [select the Event button near Containment and tick the newchild event]
-or create a custom constraint on the Constraint aspect attached to the Any container and select it to be checked on every OnNewChild event
If you chose the 1st option, any container/contaiment which is not 0..* will be checked on the NewChild event.
In the 2nd case your custom constraint can be defined so that it will check only Any models, upon NewChild event arrivals.
Br,Zoli
>
> Zawar Qayyum wrote:
> > Akos
> >
> > I am using GME as part of my research in modelling an architectural
> > definition language Pi-ADL at Université de Bretagne-Sud. I
> must say
> > that its a very robust and well written tool. I have a
> little question
> > however: In my meta model I have a <<Model>> called Any, which can
> > contain (through a containment relationship) atmost one instance of
> > <<Atom>> BaseType. How do I express that in the subset of
> OCL that GME
> > implements? Customizing the multiplicity doesn't seem to have the
> > desired effect since I want to /*prevent*/ the addition of
> more than one
> > BaseTypes.
> >
> > I would have liked to post this question on a relevant discussion
> > forum
> > but didn't find any. Could you point me to any such forum
> that you know of?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> > Zawar
>
> _______________________________________________
> gme-users mailing list
> gme-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/gme-users
>
More information about the gme-users
mailing list