[gme-users] adding registry nodes via General Preferences in themetamodel

[Zoltan Molnar]

I believe GenPrefs can be used for such purpose.
Inherited registry nodes can be overwritten/specialized anytime by
inserting a node with the same name. If you'd like to revert later, you
have just to delete the node in the fco, and the inherited one (either
from a base, or from the meta definition) will be visible again.
 
Zoli

-----Original Message-----
From: gme-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
[mailto:gme-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf Of Matthew
J. Emerson
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 2:03 PM
To: gme-users
Subject: RE: [gme-users] adding registry nodes via General Preferences
in themetamodel



Also, if registry nodes are specified this way in a base type in the
metamodel, can they be overridden in a derived type by using the same
key-names?

 


  _____  


From: gme-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
[mailto:gme-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf Of Matthew
J. Emerson
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 1:37 PM
To: gme-users
Subject: [gme-users] adding registry nodes via General Preferences in
the metamodel

 

I want to add some key-value pairs to the registry which will act like
C++ static class attributes for some of the kinds defined in my
metamodel.

 

Is this done simply by adding into the General Preferences field of each
class something of the form "<key> = <value>"?

 

Thanks,

Matt

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/pipermail/gme-users/attachments/20060511/ceec75cb/attachment.htm