[great-users] avoiding recompilation of UDM generated API-s

[jeff]

I saw your email and it reminded me I still have no resolution of my 
GReAT questions. I don't know if someone is working on it or if it will 
ever work. No one responded to my last email. Do you know if something 
is in the works.

Sandeep Neema wrote:

>GReAT Guys,
>This issue was raised earlier regarding regeneration/recompilation of
>the UDM generated API-s for every smallest tweaks to transformation
>rules, even if it does not have any effect on the metamodels of
>transformation source/target.
>
>With some big paradigms this turns out unfortunately to be a big time
>sink, inviting a coffee trip every time one runs the transformation
>after making some mods, since the compilation of the UDM generated API
>with Release build settings takes a significant amount of time.
>
>One easy tweak I could see is to add a 'check box' in the master
>interpreter and let the user decide whether he wants UDM to be invoked.
>Alternately, a plug-in could be developed that effectively sets the
>'dirty bit' when any class diagram in the model is modified, since the
>last invocation of UDM.
>
>Please share any thoughts/suggestions, or workaround that you may have
>come up with -
>
>Thanks,
>Sandeep
>
>--
>Sandeep Neema
>Research Scientist,
>Institute of Software Integrated Systems, Vanderbilt University
>Phone: 615-343-9996
>Email: sandeep.k.neema at vanderbilt.edu
>
>_______________________________________________
>great-users mailing list
>great-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
>http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/great-users
>
>
>  
>