[great-users] Another Ethereal Question
Aditya Agrawal
aditya.agrawal at gmail.com
Fri Apr 14 10:13:48 CDT 2006
Hi Chris,
I guess the main reason was that we weren't sure what the front end should
look like. :)
Adi
-----Original Message-----
From: great-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
[mailto:great-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf Of Chris
vanBuskirk
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 1:26 AM
To: A list for GReAT users to share bugs, fixes and ideas
Subject: [great-users] Another Ethereal Question
The GReAT manual claims that exporting UMT transformation rules to XML
is desirable in order to "divorce the transformation engine
implementation from its high-level language" (or something similar in
spirit).
OTOH, I've yet to see many examples of "beauty for the sake of beauty"
when it comes to the GME family (grin). Does anyone remember the
_actual_ story behind this one?
Your Favorite Curmudgeon,
Chris
_______________________________________________
great-users mailing list
great-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/great-users
More information about the great-users
mailing list