[great-users] Transformation idioms

[Sandeep Neema]

Joe,

This did come up in prior discussions wrt GREAT. The idea there was to
create templatized patterns that could be instantiated and reused in
different transformation contexts. I am not sure to what extent it has
been implemented - perhaps one of the core developers could comment -

 

Thanks,

Sandeep

 

--

Sandeep Neema

Research Scientist,

Institute of Software Integrated Systems, Vanderbilt University

Phone: 615-343-9996

Email: sandeep.k.neema at vanderbilt.edu

  _____  

From: great-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
[mailto:great-users-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf Of Joe
Porter
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 9:20 AM
To: great-users
Subject: [great-users] Transformation idioms

 

I have a question:

Looking at the approach and capabilities of the GReAT toolchain, it
seems like you would want to have some common algorithmic idioms.  I'm
thinking of things like finding disjoint subgraphs or spanning trees.
One of the examples also mentioned topological sort. I'm stretching a
little here since I haven't used the tool, but this is a journey of
understanding.   Is there a way to do that sort of thing generically for
different metamodels, or are things like that even useful in practice?
Or rather, have I missed something regarding the approach? 

Hopefully all of you that use GReAT on a regular basis can steer me in
the right direction.

Thanks,
-Joe Porter
Southwest Research Institute

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/pipermail/great-users/attachments/20060509/e86192f9/attachment.htm