[great-users] Abstract superclass

[Joe Porter]

Sorry for the panic -- I think I have it.  There were problems with rules
both upstream and downstream from this one.   It seems to be working
correctly now.

-Joe

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Joe Porter <joe.porter at gmail.com> wrote:

> Does abstract superclass matching work?
>
> Here's what I have (see attached image abstract.jpg) -- I want to match any
> of the subclasses of CommDst, but it only seems to get some of them.  The
> inheritance tree is in the other image (inherit.jpg).  So the question is --
> what is supposed to happen here?  The match seems to find the ChannelRef and
> Message objects, but not the MessageRef objects.  Should this even work at
> all, or am I too far out in uncharted territory?
>
> Thanks,
> -Joe
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/pipermail/great-users/attachments/20080815/cd1786e9/attachment.html