[great-users] Handling of abstract classes and transformation debugging

[Joe Porter]

Leonard,

Can you post a few screen capture images of the metamodel structure
you're interested in and the proposed rules?

Thanks,
-Joe

2012/3/1 Léonard PETNGA <lpetnga at gmail.com>:
>
> Hi everyone! I'm a new user of the GME/GREAT tool suite and I have some
> questions for you guys.
> 1.  I have written a rule containing a pattern including an abstract class
> (at level n). I want GREAT to use this rule to create an object based on the
> pattern provided as input. However, in my next rule, I need to get access to
> the inherited classes (level n-1) in the next rule ie the real objects
> abstracted. Since GREAT does not allow me to represent inheritance (as
> specified in the Metamodel) can I just (in the next rule) connect the real
> objects at n-1 to the real one at n+1 as children and parent by bypassing
> the abstract class? If no please clarify this point to me. I will also
> welcome any more efficient way to handle this kind of situation.
> 2. Is there anyway to "debug" or test the transformation rule by rule prior
> to running the Master interpreter?
> Thank,
> Leonard
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> great-users mailing list
> great-users at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/great-users
>