[udm-dev] IMPORTANT: GReAT vs udm_ns results

Attila Vizhanyo viza at isis.vanderbilt.edu
Wed Aug 3 11:48:25 CDT 2005


Endre,

Jo hir, hogy mennek a GReAT tesztek. 
Irtal Matt-nek reference port ugyben?

Kossz,
Attila



> -----Original Message-----
> From: udm-dev-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu 
> [mailto:udm-dev-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf 
> Of Endre Magyari
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 14:39
> To: udm-dev at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> Subject: Re: [udm-dev] IMPORTANT: GReAT vs udm_ns results
> 
> 
> Attila,
> 
> > 2, At least one, (possible more) Udm TOMI function code has been 
> > invalidated because of the removal of Diagram-Class composition 
> > relationship in UmlInUml.
> > 	Example: in the implementation of set<Object> 
> > Object::GetAdjacentObjects(const ::Uml::Class & clsDstType, const 
> > AssociationInfo& ascType)
> > 		Ln 300: 
> ::Uml::Diagram::Cast(clsDstType.parent()), where clsDstType 
> > is of type Uml::Class
> >
> > I would recommend to search for "Uml::Diagram" in all Udm 
> source code 
> > base to find all problems like 2. This is quite tedious, but still 
> > necessary to guarantee elimination of the problem. (I have 
> done this 
> > for GReAT already)
> 
> It seems that only in UdmTomi.cpp were 4 such cases.
> I have corrected them and checked in the modifications.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Endre
> _______________________________________________
> udm-dev mailing list
> udm-dev at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu 
> http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/udm-dev
> 


More information about the udm-dev mailing list