[udm-dev] MetaGME2UML Error

[Aditya Agrawal]

Hi Daniel,

I don't know if set inheritance was around when I wrote the original version
of the code. 

Currently it does seen like a check that is not required. You might want to
comment it out and see if something breaks. That may give us some clues at
to why the check was put in place to begin with.  :)

Thanks,
Adi



-----Original Message-----
From: udm-dev-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
[mailto:udm-dev-bounces at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf Of Daniel
Balasubramanian
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 2:07 AM
To: udm-dev at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
Subject: [udm-dev] MetaGME2UML Error

Hi everybody,

I think I might be getting an erroneous error in the MetaGME2UML
interpreter.  I've attached a picture of the part of the metamodel that is
giving the error.  As you can see, "DefaultConfiguration" has normal
inheritance from "Configuration."  However, when I run the MetaGME2UML
interpreter, I get the following error message:

Error: Set:DefaultConfiguration in ParadigmSheet:ReconfigStrategy  Doesnt
have any members defined

The error comes from the following lines of code in the GReAT Sources:
if(setmembers.size()<1)
{	//Error
string error = "Error: Set:"+(string)contain.name()+ " in ParadigmSheet:" +
(string)ps.name() + " Doesnt have any members defined";
throw udm_exception(error);
}

I believe that DefaultConfiguration should have some set members defined
(because it inherits from Configuration, which contains 3 references and one
Reference).  The problem appears to be that there is nothing in the code to
add the members of the parent to the child class in the case where they are
both Sets.

If possible, could someone please confirm my suspicion as to whether or not
this is a bug in the interpreter?  I've also attached a .zip file which
contains a simple 4 element metamodel that also gives the same error. (I
zipped it because some email programs have trouble with .xme files for some
reason).

Thanks,
Daniel