[udm-dev] RE: question for next week

[Zsolt Kalmar]

Endre,
I would go with umd_ns2 for OTIF but modification date of
VSS/udm_ns2/src/UDM/UdmCorbaCPPH.cpp looks old. 
Did you update udm_ns2 ?

zsolt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Endre Magyari [mailto:endre at isis.vanderbilt.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 2:02 AM
> To: Zsolt Kalmar
> Cc: Udm-dev at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> Subject: Re: question for next week
> 
> 
> 
> Zsolt,
> 
> 	Now it compiles, but there is some work on the OTIF side as well, as
> follows:
> 
> 
> for udm_ns:
> 
>    -- new functions to implement on OTIF side:
> 
> Namespace CreateCORBANamespace();
> void InitCORBANamespace(const Namespace &obj, const Diagram &parent, const
> char *name);
> 
>    -- existing signatures to modify:
> 
> -void InitCORBAClass(const Class &obj, const Diagram &parent, const char
> *name,
> bool isAbstract, const char *stereo = NULL);
> +void InitCORBAClass(const Class &obj, const Namespace &parent, const char
> *name, bool isAbstract, const char *stereo = NULL);
> 
> -void InitCORBAAssociation(const Association &obj, const Diagram &parent,
> const
> char *name);
> +void InitCORBAAssociation(const Association &obj, const Namespace
> &parent, const char *name);
> 
> -void InitCORBAComposition(const Composition &obj, const Diagram &parent,
> const
> char *name);
> +void InitCORBAComposition(const Composition &obj, const Namespace
> &parent, const char *name);
> 
> 
> - for udm_ns2:
> 
> 	-- New functions to implement on OTIF side:
> 
> Namespace CreateCORBANamespace();
> void InitCORBANamespace(const Namespace &obj, const Diagram &parent, const
> char *name);
> void InitCORBAClass(const Class &obj, const Namespace &parent, const char
> *name, bool isAbstract, const char *stereo = NULL);
> void InitCORBAAssociation(const Association &obj, const Namespace &parent,
> const char *name);
> void InitCORBAComposition(const Composition &obj, const Namespace &parent,
> const char *name);
> 
> 
> 
> 	I have tried to modify the logic of generation the CORBA init code
> according to the modifications in Udm, but this must be tested once the
> OTIF side is ready.
> 
> 
>   Thanks,
> Endre
> 
> 
> On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 23:38:48 -0500, Zsolt Kalmar
> <zsolt.kalmar at vanderbilt.edu> wrote:
> 
> > Endre,
> > I've tried to compile OTIF with udm_ns.
> > Udm_ns has the following problems:
> > 1. -c switch was commented out, I put it back
> > 2. UdmCotbacpp.cpp file was not in the project, I put it back.
> > 3. It does not compile, I gave up.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > zsolt
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Endre Magyari [mailto:endre at isis.vanderbilt.edu]
> >> Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 2:02 PM
> >> To: Gabor Karsai; Attila Vizhanyo; Feng Shi; Kalmar, Zsolt; 'Neema,
> >> Sandeep'; Daniel Balasubramanian; Anantha Narayanan
> >> Subject: Re: question for next week
> >>
> >>
> >> There were a couple of minor issues, but as of now all tests are green
> >> for
> >> both udm_ns and udm_ns2 projects.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Endre
> >>
> >> On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 01:01:40 -0500, Gabor Karsai
> >> <gabor.karsai at vanderbilt.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Guys,
> >> >
> >> > Now that the new and shiny GME is out, can we build a compatible
> GReAT
> >> > release? Is UDM_NS ready for this?
> >> > Please think about this and let's discuss it Monday.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > -- Gabor
> >> >
> >
> >