[ace-users] loosing signal for "connection closed"

[Douglas C. Schmidt]

Hi Ali,

To ensure that we have proper version/platform/compiler information,
please make sure you fill out the appropriate problem report form (PRF),
which is in

$ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM
$TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM

or in

$ACE_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM
$TAO_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM

in older versions of ACE+TAO.  Make sure to include this information
when asking any questions about ACE+TAO since otherwise we have to
"guess" what version/platform/compiler/options you've using, which is
very error-prone and slows down our responsiveness.  If you don't use
the PRF, therefore, it is less likely that someone from the core
ACE+TAO developer team will be able to answer your question.
Naturally, we encourage and appreciate other members of the ACE+TAO
user community who can respond to questions that they have the answers
to.

Thanks,

Doug

>    i am writing a small server wich should forward data from one client 
> C1 to the second one C2.
> 
> C1 is sending data very fast, to slow down C1 with ACE handle_input of 
> C1's handler returns value > 0 if there is still pending data for C2.
> 
> Data from C1 is put in the message queue of C2, which C2 will forward in 
> it's handle_ouput after the reactor does a callback. For that i have 
> increased the size of C2's message queue with 
> msg_queue()->high_water_mark().
> 
> Problem is: All the data is transferred successfully, C1 does send data 
> slowly if C2 is still processing. But sometimes the reactor does not 
> call handle_input() if C1 is closing its socket () and handle_close of 
> C1 is nerver called?
> 
> Any hints would be very helpfull?
> 
> 
> with best regards,
> Ali
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ace-users mailing list
> ace-users at mail.cse.wustl.edu
> http://mail.cse.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/ace-users