[Ace-users] Re: [tao-users] performance of COS Notification

Douglas C. Schmidt schmidt at dre.vanderbilt.edu
Mon Jul 16 06:46:15 CDT 2007


Hi Friedhelm,

> TAO VERSION : 1.5.8
> ACE VERSION : 5.5.8
> 
> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM:
>     i686 pc, SUSE linux Enterprise Server 9, Kernel 2.6.5
> 
> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL):
>     gcc 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux)
> 
> THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE:
>     #include "config-linux.h"
> 
> THE $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude
> /platform_macros.GNU FILE :
>     include $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform- linux.GNU
> 
> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features
>     (used by MPC when you generate your own makefiles):
>     N/A
> 
> AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED:
>     COS Notification
> 
> SYNOPSIS:
>     performance benchmarks for COS Notification
> 
> DESCRIPTION:
> Hi there,
> 
> we are considering COS (RT) Notification as a means to
> exchange (a large amount of) asynchronous data.
> I guess we are not the first ones out there doing this.
> Are there any recent performance benchmarks or experiences from
> projects, where the Notification service is used?
> 
> We're especially interested in throughput and scalability
> depending on the message size.

Please see

TAO_ROOT/orbsvcs/tests/Notify/performance-tests

Thanks,

        Doug



More information about the Ace-users mailing list