[Ace-users] [tao-users] performance of COS Notification
Friedhelm Wolf
friedhelm.wolf at googlemail.com
Mon Jul 16 06:42:39 CDT 2007
TAO VERSION : 1.5.8
ACE VERSION : 5.5.8
HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM:
i686 pc, SUSE linux Enterprise Server 9, Kernel 2.6.5
COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL):
gcc 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux)
THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE:
#include "config-linux.h"
THE $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU FILE :
include $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform- linux.GNU
CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features
(used by MPC when you generate your own makefiles):
N/A
AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED:
COS Notification
SYNOPSIS:
performance benchmarks for COS Notification
DESCRIPTION:
Hi there,
we are considering COS (RT) Notification as a means to
exchange (a large amount of) asynchronous data.
I guess we are not the first ones out there doing this.
Are there any recent performance benchmarks or experiences from
projects, where the Notification service is used?
We're especially interested in throughput and scalability
depending on the message size.
Thanks in advance,
Friedhelm
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/pipermail/ace-users/attachments/20070716/a23b9b18/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Ace-users
mailing list