[Ace-users] Re: [ciao-users] performance of COS Notification
friedhelm.wolf at googlemail.com
Mon Jul 16 06:41:09 CDT 2007
sorry ... you're right ... I just get confused about the lists ...
I will repost on tao-users.
Thanks for pointing that out,
On 7/16/07, William R. Otte <wotte at dre.vanderbilt.edu> wrote:
> Hi Friedhelm -
> This might be best asked on tao-users, just keep in mind that we
> don't yet support the notification service in CIAO/DanCE!
> On Jul 16, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Friedhelm Wolf wrote:
> > CIAO VERSION: 0.5.8
> > TAO VERSION : 1.5.8
> > ACE VERSION : 5.5.8
> > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM:
> > i686 pc, SUSE linux Enterprise Server 9, Kernel 2.6.5
> > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL):
> > gcc 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux)
> > THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE:
> > #include "config-linux.h"
> > THE $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU FILE :
> > include $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform- linux.GNU
> > CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features
> > (used by MPC when you generate your own makefiles):
> > N/A
> > AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED:
> > COS Notification
> > SYNOPSIS:
> > performance benchmarks for COS Notification
> > DESCRIPTION:
> > Hi there,
> > we are considering COS (RT) Notification as a means to
> > exchange (a large amount of) asynchronous data.
> > I guess we are not the first ones out there doing this.
> > Are there any recent performance benchmarks or experiences from
> > projects, where the Notification service is used?
> > We're especially interested in throughput and scalability
> > depending on the message size.
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Friedhelm
> > _______________________________________________
> > ciao-users mailing list
> > ciao-users at mail.cse.wustl.edu
> > http://mail.cse.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/ciao-users
> ciao-users mailing list
> ciao-users at mail.cse.wustl.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ace-users