[Ace-users] [tao-users] Policy creation failures (Security, Messaging)
jwillemsen at remedy.nl
Wed Oct 31 04:49:57 CDT 2007
I have seen recently a problem with strategies and messaging, but security
and messaging should work.
2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs
www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl
*** Integrated compile and test statistics see
*** Commercial service and support for ACE/TAO/CIAO ***
*** See http://www.theaceorb.nl/en/support.html ***
"Venkat" <swara101 at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<1193806055.319689.316920 at i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>...
> Hello TAO team,
> Following is the PRF details for the problem
> TAO VERSION: 1.6.1
> ACE VERSION: 5.6.1
> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM:
> amd64, NetBSD 3.1
> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST:
> THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE [if you use a link to a platform-
> specific file, simply state which one]:
> THE $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU FILE :
> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features
> AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED:
> COMPILATION? No
> LINKING? No
> EXECUTION? Yes
> Application - Messaging and Security Policy configuration failure
> Setup application with SSLIOP secuirty. Configuration of various
> policies on the orb has a problem.
> Built an application with SSLIOP security. Following security policy
> creation works....
> any_val <<= Security::SecQOPIntegrityAndConfidentiality;
> orb->create_policy(Security::SecQOPPolicy, any_val);
> However, creating the following policy causes policy error. Actually,
> any Messaging policy setup is failing.
> orb->create_policy(TAO::CONNECTION_TIMEOUT_POLICY_TYPE, cany_val);
> I ran TAO/tests/AMI_Timeouts to see whether Messaging policy has a
> problem. The test runs without a problem.
> It seems the combination of security and Messaging has a problem. Any
> ideas what could or should be helpful to narrow it down?
> REPEAT BY:
> SAMPLE FIX/WORKAROUND:
More information about the Ace-users