[Ace-users] [tao-users] QoS timeout policy

[Johnny Willemsen]

Hi,

Can you try to do the same with 1.6.1? A lot has been changed after 1.5. I
would also expect that the _narrow() will respect the timeout.

Regards 

Johnny Willemsen
Remedy IT
Postbus 101
2650 AC  Berkel en Rodenrijs
The Netherlands
www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl  

*** Integrated compile and test statistics see
http://scoreboard.theaceorb.nl ***
*** Commercial service and support for ACE/TAO/CIAO             ***
*** See http://www.theaceorb.nl/en/support.html                 ***

> TAO VERSION: 1.5
> ACE VERSION: 5.5
> 
> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM:
> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130  @ 2.00GHz
> Linux 2.6.16.21-0.8-smp #1 SMP i386 GNU/Linux
> 
> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST:
> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL):
> gcc version 3.4.3
> 
> DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT:
>     COMPILATION?        
>         No.
>     LINKING?
>         No.
>     EXECUTION?
>         Yes.
> 
> SYNOPSIS:
> Does Messaging::RELATIVE_RT_TIMEOUT_POLICY_TYPE affect _narrow()?
> I have a client orb set up with
> Messaging::RELATIVE_RT_TIMEOUT_POLICY_TYPE set to 1 sec on Orb level
> according to 
> http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/PDF/C++-report-col19.pdf.
> The narrow() for the object I am trying to invoke hangs since about 30
> minutes. Is there anything I can do to set a timeout for narrow()?
> 
> SAMPLE FIX/WORKAROUND:
> None.
> 
> TIA,
> Christian Fromme
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tao-users mailing list
> tao-users at mail.cse.wustl.edu
> http://mail.cse.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/tao-users
>