[ace-users] message transfer between processes.
Kim J. Schmock
KJS at capres.com
Wed Sep 26 02:49:04 CDT 2007
The example suggested is a blocking example. Is it possible to use SPIPE
with reactor in an acceptor/connect kind of way?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: schmidt at dre.vanderbilt.edu [mailto:schmidt at dre.vanderbilt.edu]
> Sent: 25. september 2007 14:45
> To: Kim J. Schmock
> Cc: ace-users at cs.wustl.edu
> Subject: Re: [ace-users] message transfer between processes.
> Hi Kim,
> To ensure that we have proper version/platform/compiler information,
> please make sure you fill out the appropriate problem report form
> which is in
> or in
> in older versions of ACE+TAO. Make sure to include this information
> when asking any questions about ACE+TAO since otherwise we have to
> "guess" what version/platform/compiler/options you've using, which is
> very error-prone and slows down our responsiveness. If you don't use
> the PRF, therefore, it is less likely that someone from the core
> ACE+TAO developer team will be able to answer your question.
> Naturally, we encourage and appreciate other members of the ACE+TAO
> user community who can respond to questions that they have the answers
> > Looking for a way of transfer messages between two process spaces
> ACE with reactor on windows xp.
> I recommend you use
> and ACE_Acceptor/ACE_Connector, as shown in C++NPv1/C++NPv2
> > I looked at SPIPE. Try to use one example, but it doesn't seem to
> ACE_SPIPE should work fine. Please see
> for an example to ry.
> > Then I found UPIPE. Try the example, and it works. Example is based
> threads, and not different process space.
> Right - it's not what you want to use..
> > Search for UPIPE documentation. Can't find any references in the
> Found that it stands for "User pipe".
> > What is the UPIPE capability compared to SPIPE ?
> You don't want to use UPIPE for what you're trying to do.
> Take care,
More information about the Ace-users