[cadynce] Model Checking results for GT4 w 50, 48 and 46 Blades.

[Adam Porter]

Gautam,

    Which configurations did you use for this?

Adam



Gautam Thaker wrote:
> Please see
>
> https://repo.isis.vanderbilt.edu/twiki/bin/view/CADYNCE/OneFiftyFiftyCase1#1000_Allocations_using_a_modifie
>
> where I have uploaded results of some long simulation
> runs with GT4 over the memorial day weekend. Comments
> welcome. All SCIs were at same priority though the
> scheduling model is run to completion and not time
> shared (we don't know the quanta). I believe the
> results would not be too different, but hard to say.
> Also, not sure how different the results would be if
> we employ rate monotically assigned priorities with
> preemption. A bit of care is needed there since we
> have merging of flows in GT4, i assume we can inherit
> the priority of the highest flowrate that merges...
>
> I will attempt these priority based runs next in order
> to gain more insights.
>
> Gautam
>
>
>        
> ____________________________________________________________________________________You snooze, you lose. Get messages ASAP with AutoCheck
> in the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_html.html
> _______________________________________________
> Cadynce mailing list
> Cadynce at list.isis.vanderbilt.edu
> http://list.isis.vanderbilt.edu/mailman/listinfo/cadynce
>